@AllenInSLC I had the same experience, that my post was deleted when I posted evidence with links to prove that dice rolls were not random at all but engineered to favour a single player.
Developer does not care to fix the game and refuses to communicate regarding feedbacks.
They should be sued to take money for a purposely flawed game.

Yep, they had an update a while back and screwed it up. It turns out their development staff introduces bugs quite regularly... not good testing. A later update fixed it on iPad ios but it is still a problem on iPhone ios. The also don't tell you which scenario you are playing anymore after a game starts.

Completely agree with the respondents above. The number of times the dice are rolled with the exact same numbers in a row is no where near statistically correct. It would be one thing to see a particular number such as 4 come up several times in a game, but when it is rolled back to back to back to back, and then the same thing happens after two apparently random rolls you have to think there is a significant flaw.

I don’t think this is an AI issue. My belief is that this is a randomization code issue. There is no true random number generator in computer languages so someone has made their own but it is flawed.

Of note, I am on iOS. This would appear to be a core issue and not just one platform given that Android users are also reporting the issue.

Today I just had a game that was a classic case of this, with 52 rolls but not a single 6. I'm not sure how this is even possible. We were 3 players and the one player absolutely dominated the game as another player and I depended on the 6 for wood. End game results were 12 to 2 to 2, clearly a consequence of dice that seemed ''rigged'' against 6s (not realistic).

Dice rolls:
2: 1
3: 3
4: 6
5: 8
6: 0
7: 6
8: 14
9: 6
10: 3
11: 4
12: 1

@Administrator I am currently playing on the PC Steam version

@inoch I don´t quite seem to understand what you mean by that. Could you please elaborate on that topic?